I am
preparing a workshop presentation for middle and high school teachers titled Teaching with and for Creativity and
Critical Thinking. The current
writing regarding 21st century
skills that are necessary for students
to be college ready and career ready stresses the need for both.
Here is
a partial list of skills students should be developing:
·
Effectively
analyze and evaluate evidence, arguments, claims and beliefs
·
Analyze
and evaluate major alternative points of view
·
Synthesize
and make connections between information and arguments
·
Interpret
information and draw conclusions based on the best analysis
·
Reflect
critically on learning experiences and processes
·
Use
a wide range of idea creation techniques (such as brainstorming)
·
Create
new and worthwhile ideas (both incremental and radical concepts)
·
Elaborate,
refine, analyze and evaluate their own ideas in order to improve and maximize
creative efforts.
So some
will ask is there time and space in the current curriculum and state standards
for such skills to be taught, practiced and internalized?
A
Newsweek article on creativity suggested…“creativity should be taken out of the art room and put into homeroom.
The argument that we can’t teach creativity because kids already have too much
to learn is a false trade-off. Creativity isn’t about freedom from concrete
facts. Rather, fact-finding and deep research are vital stages in the creative
process. Scholars argue that current curriculum standards can still be met, if
taught in a different way. “
The focus
of my workshop session will be on the good news is that instructional options
designed for students to develop critical thinking, problem solving and
creativity skills also enhance the internalization of important content knowledge. The right mix of
direct instruction with less structured
real world problem solving can set the stage for higher ability students
and low achievers to master crucial content and important process skills. My
workshop will explore the “why” and “how” of planning for these learning
options.
The
Newsweek article includes a great example from teachers who came up with a
project for the fifth graders to figure out how to reduce the noise in the
library. Its windows faced a public space and, even when closed, let through
too much noise. The students had four weeks to design proposals. An intense
study of sound preceded brainstorming ideas and then testing out possibilities.
Here is
another strategy from Thom Markham in a piece titled, Can
We Really Teach Creativity?
"Use
breakthrough assessments. Rubrics with a ‘breakthrough’ category—a blank column
that invites students to deliver a product that cannot be anticipated or easily
defined in words. It’s not the ‘A’ category—that’s Mastery or Commended or a
similar high-ranking indicator. The breakthrough column goes beyond the A,
rewarding innovation, creativity, and something new outside the formal curriculum.
It’s a ‘show me’ category. Students like it, and so do teachers. It
particularly appeals to high-end students who feel current offerings are drab,
or to the middling student who will not work just for a grade, but who seeks
the psychic reward of creating something cool. For samples of these rubrics, go
to Thom Markham's web site and click on ‘PBL Resources'."
I’d love to
hear examples you’ve seen or done to combine creativity, critical thinking and
standard curriculum.

1 comment:
I have been very interested in this since NJ adopted the 21st Century Skills as an additional part of the NJ CCCS requirements. I researched some assessments in order to get a baseline on students, so that growth could be demonstrated. I found wonderful resources on the Catalina Foothills website. Check it out;http://www.cfsd16.org/public/_century/centMain.aspx
Ronni Reed
Post a Comment